
The Vibe Coding
Stack That Ships
The 7 tool decisions you make once that you'll never outgrow. Choose yours and leave with a blueprint you can build any SaaS on.
Why Most Vibe Coders
Hit a Wall
You start with a one-shot tool. Chat-driven, no code, instant results. A landing page in five minutes. A prototype that makes people say "wait, you built that?" It feels like magic.
Then you try to add payments. Or real authentication. Or a database that doesn't look like a construction site. And you hit a wall. Not a learning wall — a compromise wall. You can make it work, but every workaround creates another problem that's going to bite you later.
SaaS without payment is a demo. And if you want to build a real product — one that charges money, manages users, and scales — you need to know whether your stack can get you there.
What I hear every week:
I hear this every week from builders in our community. They start excited, ship a prototype, then realize the payment flow doesn't do what they need, user access management gets complicated, or they can't collaborate with a co-founder the way they expected. The feeling is always the same: fear of running against a wall of complexity where you just can't continue.
Six signs your stack has a ceiling:
Limited debugging. AI makes mistakes. When it does, you need real debugging power — inspecting state, reading error traces, stepping through logic. A chat window that says "try again" isn't enough when something breaks in production.
Extensibility within boundaries. Most platforms now offer integrations — some even support MCP servers. But you're working within what the platform provides. When you need a tool they don't support, or a custom integration they haven't built yet, you wait.
Data ownership with friction. You own your code — most platforms let you export it. But the database is often managed for you, invisible on your own dashboard. Migration is possible, but it's manual work, and the default keeps you locked in.
Collaboration on their terms. Shared workspaces exist, but the 30-year Git workflow — branching, pull requests, code review — often doesn't apply. Bring in a senior developer and they'll likely want to move to a standard setup.
Innovation at their pace. Platforms do update — some impressively fast. But when something new drops that matters to your product, you're on their roadmap, not yours.
Payments that get complicated. Stripe integrations exist now — some are genuinely good for simple checkout flows. But the moment you need custom post-payment logic — verifying access, managing subscriptions, handling credits, gating content — the compromises add up. And those are the flows your paying customers depend on most.
The trade-off is real. Choosing your own stack means learning the skills and building a basic understanding of software development. That can be a lot for people.
But if you're the person who says "I want to build my own SaaS, I want to charge people for good service" — you owe it to yourself and to the people using your product that you understand this. That you can fix bugs. That you can make it as secure as possible.
What Makes a Stack
Compound
A compounding stack isn't about picking the "best" individual tools. It's about picking tools that make each other more powerful over time.
Shared conventions. AI-readability. Composability. When your auth system, your database, and your payment layer all share the same user identity — set up once — every new feature you build gets easier because the foundation already knows who's logged in, what they've paid for, and what they can access.
When your AI editor has read your entire codebase — your conventions, your component library, your database schema — it doesn't just write code. It orchestrates across layers. One conversation can build a landing page, set up the database, wire the payment flow, and deploy it live.
The moment I couldn't go back:
The first real compounding moment for me was when I could speak to Cursor, it made changes to my website, committed to GitHub, which triggered a deployment on Vercel, and the changes showed up on a live production website. Voice to live product. I can never go back from that. That keeps me from even considering any other page builder.
Here's what we'll do together.
We'll walk through 7 layers of a vibe coding stack. For each layer, you'll make a choice between three paths — a simpler option, my recommendation, and a more advanced alternative. You can also write in your own.
After each choice, you'll see what other builders picked. At the end, you'll have a complete, personalized stack config — ready to copy-paste into any AI and start building.
This is the same Stack Builder we walk through in the Builder Lab — every decision, together, in real time.
Layer 1The Hub
Your AI development environment. This is where you write, debug, and orchestrate everything. The quality of everything else in your stack depends on how well your AI understands your project.
Three types of tools compete for this layer:
Chat-based AI builders like Lovable, Bolt, and v0. You describe what you want, they generate a full app. Great for prototypes and landing pages. The ceiling shows up when you need real debugging, custom integrations, or the kind of post-payment logic that turns a prototype into a business.
AI-powered code editors like Cursor, Windsurf, and Google Antigravity. These sit inside a full development environment. They read your entire codebase, understand your conventions, and connect to external tools through MCP servers. More to learn upfront, but the compounding is real — every file you add, every convention you establish makes the AI more capable.
Terminal-based AI tools like Claude Code, Codex CLI, and Gemini CLI. Pure command line. Fast, scriptable, composable with other CLI tools. The most powerful option for developers who already think in terminals.
For vibe coders without a development background, we recommend starting with Cursor. It's visual, it has the most mature MCP server ecosystem, and it reads your entire project — every rule you write, every component you build makes it smarter. That's the compounding that chat-based builders can't match.
If you have development experience and feel at home in the terminal, Claude Code gives you the most direct control. Think of it as the difference between a graphical interface and the command line — same power, different comfort zone.
One thing that's explicitly not a stack decision: the AI model. Claude, GPT, Gemini — they change every few months, and you'll switch between them constantly. Most of these tools work with all of them. The choice that compounds is your environment, not which model powers it.
Choose your Hub
Your AI development environment — first, pick your approach.
Layer 2The Shipping Engine
How your code becomes a live product. This is the modern equivalent of choosing a CMS — like deciding between WordPress and Webflow in the old days. Except now the decision shapes how well AI can help you, how fast you can iterate, and whether you can collaborate with others.
Three approaches compete here:
Built-in deployment from your AI builder — Lovable, Bolt, or Replit ship for you. No Git, no terminal. Great for getting live fast.
Managed framework stacks like Next.js + Vercel or SvelteKit + Vercel. These are bundles — framework, hosting, and Git designed to work together. The result: git push = live product. Preview deployments on every change. Rollback in seconds. This is where the shipping cadence from Ship Every Week becomes physically possible.
Custom framework stacks for developers who want to choose every piece — TanStack Start, Astro, or Docker-based deployments. More flexibility, more infrastructure work.
Choose your Shipping Engine
How your code becomes a live product — first, pick your approach.
Layer 3The Design Layer
How your product looks and feels. This isn't just about aesthetics — it's about how well your AI can generate UI code.
If you're using a chat-based builder, the built-in UI is automatic — Lovable, Bolt, and v0 all generate polished components for you. The tradeoff is less customization after generation.
Managed component libraries like shadcn/ui + Tailwind CSS have massive representation in AI training data. That matters more than you think. When you ask Cursor to build a settings page, a pricing table, or a dashboard — it generates consistently high-quality code because it has seen these components thousands of times. Professional results. Fast iteration. No fighting the framework. I asked Cursor to build a pricing table last week — because it knows shadcn/ui, it generated a production-ready component in one prompt.
Headless primitives like Radix or Base UI give you total pixel control. If you have strong design opinions and want a unique look, this is your path — but you'll build more from scratch.
Choose your Design Layer
How your product looks and feels — first, pick your approach.
Layer 4The Data You Own
Where your users' data lives. This is the layer where the difference between ownership and convenience matters most.
With built-in databases, your builder manages data automatically — Lovable provisions Supabase for you, Firebase handles everything through Google. Convenient, but you don't always have direct access.
Managed Backend-as-a-Service tools like Supabase and Convex give you full ownership with managed hosting. Supabase provides PostgreSQL with real-time subscriptions, row-level security, and edge functions. And here's the compounding: Supabase has an MCP server, which means your AI can query and manage your database directly. No context-switching. No copy-pasting SQL.
Serverless databases with ORMs like Neon + Drizzle or PlanetScale + Prisma are for developers who want full schema control and type-safe migrations. Less batteries-included, more flexibility.
A signal worth watching:
One pattern I see often: builders who can't tell me what database they're using because the platform manages it "automatically." Automatic is great until you need to debug a broken query, optimize a slow page, or migrate to a different provider. Owning your data isn't about paranoia — it's about competence.
Choose your Data You Own
Where your users' data lives — first, pick your approach.
Layer 5The Identity Layer
Who your users are. Authentication touches everything — it protects routes, gates content, manages user state, connects to payments, and provides identity for analytics.
Built-in auth from Supabase or Firebase gives you email, password, and social logins automatically. Good enough for basic needs, but limited when you need organizations or webhooks.
Managed auth services like Clerk provide the shared identity that Supabase, Stripe, and PostHog all need. Set it up once: every layer knows who's logged in, what they've paid for, and what they can access. When someone signs up, a webhook creates their user record in Supabase. When they pay, Stripe's webhook updates their access level. One identity, shared across your entire stack.
Open-source auth like Better Auth or Auth.js gives you full control with no vendor dependency. More flexible, more complex — the right choice if you know exactly what you want.
Choose your Identity Layer
Who your users are — first, pick your approach.
Layer 6The Revenue Layer
Where demos become businesses. This is where many vibe coding projects stall — not because payments are impossible, but because the flows after checkout get complicated fast.
Quick checkout through your builder gets you live fast — Stripe via Lovable or Gumroad can have you accepting payments in minutes. The tradeoff is limited post-payment logic.
Managed payment platforms like Stripe, LemonSqueezy, or Paddle handle the full infrastructure. With Stripe, you get webhooks feeding into Supabase, user access gated by Clerk, and the whole flow trackable in PostHog. Not just "add a payment link" — a connected revenue system where a single checkout creates a customer, updates their access, sends a confirmation email, and logs the conversion.
Developer-first billing via Polar or Stripe's direct API gives you maximum control — custom billing logic, usage-based pricing, and the lowest fees.
What compounding feels like:
When I built the Hackathon landing page, Cursor had the complete codebase. In one extended flow, it built the page, made all database changes, created a product in Stripe, integrated the checkout with Clerk authentication, designed the confirmation emails, and added PostHog tracking — all in one conversation. That's what a compounding stack feels like. Without that integration, the hackathon would have been 7 separate manual processes.
Choose your Revenue Layer
Where demos become businesses — first, pick your approach.
Layer 7The Operations Layer
From shipping a product to running a business. The first six layers get your product live and charging money. This layer is what turns it into something you can actually operate.
Not everyone needs operations tools on day one. If you're still building your MVP, skip this layer for now — you can always add it later.
But if you're ready, there are four categories to consider:
Analytics — See what users do. Without analytics, you're flying blind. PostHog, Mixpanel, and Plausible each take a different approach.
Email — Communicate with users. Transactional emails (receipts, confirmations) and marketing emails (updates, launches). Resend, Loops, and SendGrid are the main contenders.
Project Management — Organize what you're building. If you read last week's Vibe Management article, you know this is where the AI project manager lives.
Automation — Automate repetitive work. Workflow automation and integrations. The glue between your tools that runs while you sleep.
Together, these form the operating system that turns a shipped product into a business you can run. Pick one tool per category — or skip the ones you don't need yet.
The Operations Layer
From shipping a product to running a business
Your Stack
Here's what you've chosen. Seven decisions. One stack. A foundation strong enough to build a real SaaS business on.
Your Stack
Make your choices above to build your stack
Scroll through the article and make your choice for each layer. Your stack will appear here.
Two things to watch out for.
Don't do everything at once.
Start with Layer 1 and Layer 2. Get comfortable deploying changes. Then add layers one at a time as your product needs them. The Builder Codex is structured exactly this way — clear levels where you build confidence with each layer before moving to the next.
Don't let the AI choose your stack.
Make a conscious decision. Commit to it. Then let the AI work within that decision. If you skip this step, AI will pick a random ORM, a niche CSS framework, or an auth library with poor documentation — and you'll hit a ceiling without realizing it.
Why I trust this stack:
The stack I recommend here is the one I build Pirate Skills on. Every tool in it I use daily. I still have to discover its limitations — and when I do, I'll tell you. But so far, I haven't found a SaaS feature I can't build with it. That's the promise of a compounding stack: you decide once, and you never outgrow it.
6-week cohort program. Weekly workshops. Hands-on guidance through every layer.
Ready to Go Deeper?
Builder Lab
·Wed, Mar 18 · 18:00 CETFree weekly online session where we work on real projects together. Bring what you're building and get live feedback.
Builder Forge
·In 38 days · Wed, Apr 16-week cohort program to build and ship your first product. Weekly workshops, accountability, and hands-on guidance.
Growth Lab
·Wed, Mar 11 · 18:00 CETFree weekly online session where we work on funnels and positioning together. Bring your challenges, get live feedback.
Growth Forge
·In 80 days · Wed, May 136-week cohort program to build predictable, scalable revenue. Weekly workshops, accountability, and hands-on guidance.
Questions & Answers
Founder from Cologne with 15 years of startup experience across 9 ventures. After helping thousands master growth marketing, Ben learned vibe coding from scratch and launched CaptAIn within three months. He leads the Vibe Coding Cologne community, blending real founder experience with teaching clarity.
